Child-care allowance was Hunt's initiative
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID HUNT, the Secretary of State for Employment, was the prime mover behind the Government's surprise decision in Tuesday's Budget to help working mothers meet child-care costs.
The allowance disclosed by Kenneth Clarke, the Chancellor, will provide up to pounds 28 net a week from next October against child-care costs for single and two-parent families on family credit, disability working allowance, housing benefit and council tax benefit.
Such a scheme had been promoted by Gillian Shephard, Mr Hunt's predecessor, but had not been adopted because it was too expensive.
According to Whitehall sources, when Mr Hunt championed the idea he encountered little opposition from ministerial colleagues, chalking up a significant victory for the left in the Cabinet.
It was accepted despite advice from officials that it would be complex to administer and initially expensive.
Right-wingers had portrayed lone mothers as teenagers who got pregnant to get benefits and homes, or as responsible for rising crime. Treasury lobbying produced a commitment to spend about pounds 60m by 1996-97, with a net cost to the public sector borrowing requirement of pounds 30m.
Many lone parents are unable to take advantage of family credit - the benefit for low-income families in work or leave the benefit system, because paying child-care costs while working would leave them worse off than if they remained on income support.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments