Scotland has opportunity to target winter fuel benefit, says Sarwar
The Scottish Government will be responsible for delivering its own form of winter fuel payment from this year.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Scottish Government should explore making its version of the winter fuel payment “more targeted”, the leader of Scottish Labour has said.
This week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the benefit would move from being universal to being means-tested, sparking outrage north of the border about a potential £160 million funding gap.
As part of the process of devolving social security, the Scottish Government is due to take control of the benefit this winter.
Ministers have said the universality of the payment – which could be worth as much as £300 for pensioners – cannot be guaranteed.
But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the announcement from the Chancellor presents an “opportunity” for the benefit in Scotland.
Speaking to journalists on a visit to a community project in Easterhouse, Glasgow, he said: “This is a new devolved benefit that’s going to come to Scotland this year now that the winter fuel payment is going to be devolved.
“We have an opportunity to do that in a more progressive, fair way and I think the Scottish Government should take that opportunity.
“We’re willing to work with them and representative charities to make sure those that need the payment, those that are going to genuinely be supported by that payment, receive that payment.
I don't see the benefit in us giving a payment to those that frankly are millionaires and don't need the money
“I don’t see the benefit in us giving a payment to those that frankly are millionaires and don’t need the money at a time when people are struggling to make ends meet and our public finances are in a difficult situation.”
The MSP said he was “sympathetic” to those on the edges of receiving the benefit, who would likely lose out, adding he would work with the Scottish Government to adjust the criteria north of the border if that was required.
The Scottish Government’s support for other universal benefits has been steadfast, with things such as free tuition, prescriptions and eye tests being offered regardless of economic circumstances, as well as concessionary bus travel offered to all those under 22 and over 60.
Asked if such a move could lead to other benefits to being means-tested, Mr Sarwar rejected the idea, saying: “We’re not opening up that discussion and that debate, that has been decided in Scotland.”
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray echoed the comments from Mr Sarwar, but stressed the Chancellor’s measures protected the “poorest pensioners”.
Mr Murray also dismissed claimed Holyrood ministers were not briefed on the changes announced on Monday.
Speaking during a visit to the BAE Services in Glasgow, he said: “The Finance Secretary (Shona Robison) was told 90 minutes before the announcement was made – that was 90 minutes before anybody else apart from Cabinet.
“So people are being fully informed at the right time and that’s in the new partnership working that the Prime Minister and First Minister has set out in terms of resetting that relationship.”
The Scottish Government have been contacted for comment.
Ms Reeves’ announcement came as she attacked the former Tory Government over what she claimed was a “cover up” of a £22 billion black hole in the public finances.
To tackle the issue, she announced Whitehall departments would have to find cuts.
But in the general election campaign, Mr Sarwar emphatically rejected a return to austerity under a Labour Government, saying in a BBC debate “read my lips – no austerity under Labour”.
Speaking to the PA news agency on Thursday, he said the Government was not returning to austerity, but “getting on with fixing the mess left by this rotten Tory Government that completely destroyed the public finances, and let’s be clear, hid the truth from the public”.