Promised reforms to City ‘feel like a damp squib’, says Treasury Committee
The group of MPs said several of the Chancellor’s reforms were nothing more than publishing a document or welcoming a consultation.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A set of reforms to the City promised by the Chancellor last year have been left feeling like a “damp squib” as much of what he said he has delivered has not materialised, an influential group of MPs has said.
The Treasury Committee said the Chancellor claimed to have completed 21 of the 31 reforms to financial services he set out last year.
The group’s analysis found that six of the 21 are in fact not complete, and a further six should not have even been considered reforms in the first place.
These are things like publishing documents or welcoming a consultation, which is not the same as reforming something, the committee said.
The Edinburgh reforms were given considerable fanfare last December but, 12 months on, the lack of progress or economic impact has left them feeling like a damp squib
“More than a decade after the financial crash and six years after the UK voted to leave the European Union, the Treasury was absolutely right to look at updating regulation of the financial services sector and identifying rules which needed to be reformed or removed to encourage growth in this important economic sector,” said committee chair Harriett Baldwin.
The suggestions were called the Edinburgh reforms when laid out last December by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt.
They included changes to short selling disclosures, new remits for watchdogs, repeals of some EU rules and reforming some taxes.
Ms Baldwin, a Conservative MP, said: “We welcome many of the changes as logical and sensible measures. We do, though, question the validity of claims that welcoming consultations, establishing reviews or publishing documents should be considered reforms.
“The Edinburgh reforms were given considerable fanfare last December but, 12 months on, the lack of progress or economic impact has left them feeling like a damp squib.”
In a press release to mark the year anniversary of the Edinburgh reforms, the Government said it had delivered 22 of the 31 promises.
Without acknowledging the Treasury Committee’s claims, Economic Secretary to the Treasury Bim Afolami said: “My number one priority in this role is to deliver on the Edinburgh reforms.
“The reforms have shown the UK’s dedication to fostering a sensible, innovative and robust financial landscape – over the past year we’ve made significant strides towards creating an environment that supports economic growth, openness and the well-being of savers.”