Call for Lockerbie trial overseas
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's refusal to approve a trial of the two Libyans accused of the Lockerbie bombing in a neutral country suffered a severe set-back yesterday when a former government minister called for a change to the law so the suspects could appear before an overseas court.
Allan Stewart, who resigned last month, has tabled an amendment to the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill calling on ministers to change Scots law to allow a Scottish Lockerbie court to sit abroad. He is the first senior Tory to publicly challenge the Government's handling of the four- year-old case.
Under the amendment, the court, with a Scottish judge and jury, would hear evidence against the Libyan pair and, if convicted, they would serve their sentence in a prison north of the border.
Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi and Lamen Khalifa Fhimah have refused to surrender for trial in Scotland because they fear they would not receive a fair trial. Instead, they have offered to appear before a court in a neutral country.
Last month Douglas Hurd, the Foreign Secretary, rejected a trial overseas. Changing the law would be too time-consuming, he said.
But yesterday Mr Stewart, who has urged Mr Hurd to examine new evidence uncovered by the Independent that the case against Libya is fundamentally flawed, said: "Four years after the charges were laid, we have to find a way out of the present impasse. We can't go on like this. A Scottish court sitting overseas could break the logjam."
Relatives of the 270 people who died in the bombing in December 1988 welcomed Mr Stewart's intervention.
Dr Jim Swire, spokesman for the bereaved UK families, said: "Seven years after the attack, we still don't know why our loved ones died. A trial in a neutral country would help us to uncover the truth."
The amendment will be debated by MPs next week.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments