C4 `taken to the cleaners' over cash for film
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Channel 4 was accused yesterday of being "taken to the cleaners" over its investment in the most successful British film ever made, Four Weddings and a Funeral.
Michael Grade, chief executive of Channel 4, told the National Heritage committee of MPs investigating the film industry that the company had put up £800,000, a third of the entire budget for the film. He said the return was likely to be around £4m, though box office receipts are already well over $200m (£300m) worldwide.
The Labour MP Joe Ashton asked him: "Why were you taken to the cleaners? It does seem there should have been some sell-on rights that you weren't aware of."
Mr Grade only partially answered when he replied that distribution, marketing and other aspects of production took slices of the profits, adding: "Our actual equity investment was only £400,000. A £4m return on a £400,000 investment is a nice little earner for anybody."
Earlier, Will Wyatt, managing director of BBC Network Television, was asked if it was essential to have a British film industry, with so many films now being financed by television. Mr Wyatt replied: "I wouldn't say it was essential," though he added that overseas earnings and the nurturing of film-makers made it very desirable.
Mr Grade later took issue with Mr Wyatt, saying: "The BBC answer was less than robust. I think the film industry is essential. It is a tremendous creator of employment." Mr Grade said that Channel 4 would immediately double its £50m investment in Britishfilm if the Government's "grotesque anomaly" of the Channel 4 funding formula were ended.
At present, he said, Channel 4 had to give £50m to the shareholders of ITV which went not into programme making but into shareholders' pockets.
However, Lord Attenborough, actor, film-maker and former deputy chairman of Channel 4, said that there were big dangers in television funding so much film production. He told the committee: "The budgets are obviously much smaller and subconsciously we have indoctrinated our film-makers into preparing films and programmes for a proportion of the scale, which does not benefit cinema but dissuades the writers from creating something for cinema scale because their chances of getting backing are a million toone. Television and cinema are two quite different forms. There is a magic still in 1995 in going into that great black hole and experiencing a film with hundreds of others."
Lord Attenborough said even the habit of having coffee in cinemas arose from a generation of television viewers who could not watch a film without it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments