Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British Rail sell-off Bill 'unworkable': Lords amendment leaves Tories in dilemma on franchises. Christian Wolmar reports

Christian Wolmar
Tuesday 06 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BILL to privatise British Rail has been rendered unworkable by an amendment passed in the House of Lords on Monday night, supporters and opponents of the sell-off agreed yesterday.

The Government faces two options on the amendment which will allow BR to bid for franchises rather than, as previously, only allow bids from the private sector and management buy-outs when BR is broken up into franchises.

It can either attempt to reverse the amendment in the House of Commons when the Bill returns there in October, or it can retain the new clause. The Department of Transport intimated yesterday that no early decision would be made.

Both options are fraught with danger. A group of rebel Conservative MPs only held off from pushing a similar amendment in the Commons earlier this year after winning major concessions on railcards and fares.

Now, with those victories already in the bag, the rebels, led by Sir Keith Speed, could muster sufficient numbers to embarrass the Government. Their confidence will be boosted if the Conservatives lose the Christchurch by-election, where rail privatisation is certain to be a big factor.

However, to accept the amendment also creates difficulties. If BR was allowed to bid, few doubt it would win virtually all the contracts, effectively nullifying the whole privatisation process.

Private bidders have already been put off by the concessions on railcards and on fares which will now be tightly controlled.

William James, a solicitor with Theodore Goddard, who has studied the Government's plans in depth, said:

'There are two problems with the amendment. First, it will make it difficult for management buy-out teams to bid. And secondly, potential private-sector bids may be deterred from bidding.'

The amendment places BR managers, whom ministers privately accept will be a necessary part of any successful bids, in a very difficult position. One senior manager said: 'We won't know whether to stay with BR or join a management buy-out.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in