British Rail bribes trial collapses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE nine-week trial of a former British Rail executive accused of receiving lavish gifts in exchange for lucrative engineering contracts collapsed at the Old Bailey yesterday after the judge said that there was insufficient evidence.
Mr Justice Buckley ordered the jury to return not guilty verdicts on David Currie, former head of BR's civil engineering department, and Norbert Jurasek and Michael Brooks, executives of Plasser Railway Machinery (GB), one of BR's main equipment suppliers. All had denied the charges.
Mr Currie, 66, of Penn, Buckinghamshire, was acquitted of taking bribes between 1978 and 1988 from the company and the two executives which the prosecution had alleged included air tickets, champagne and trips to Continental nightclubs.
Mr Jurasek, 51, of Wargrave, Berkshire, Plasser's managing director, Mr Brooks, 64, of Ringwood, Hampshire, the company secretary, and Plasser were cleared of giving bribes. All the defendants were acquitted of plotting to bribe other BR employees.
The prosecution had alleged that bribes were given to encourage BR staff to award contracts to Plasser, which supplied track-laying equipment to BR.
The judge told the jury: 'The evidence simply does not amount or justify the way this case was presented to you.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments