Britain outpoints most of Europe in 'green' league
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FAR FROM being the 'Dirty Man of Europe', Britain has one of the better environmental records of the 12 European Union nations. It notches up a respectable fourth place ahead of Germany and France.
This emerges from a statistical analysis of the environmental performance of 21 industrialised nations carried out by the New Economics Foundation and the Independent.
Eleven issues were considered, covering air and water pollution, nature conservation, car use, energy efficiency and household waste. The main source was the latest environmental statistics collected from members of the 'rich countries club', the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Each country was awarded a score of between 0 and 100 for each issue - with the best scoring 100 and the worst 0 - and the scores were then averaged out.
Austria came first with 76 per cent, followed by Portugal (73 per cent) and Japan (72 per cent). Britain, with just under 64 per cent, was in 10th place out of the 21 OECD nations analysed. At the bottom were Belgium (48 per cent), Canada (37 per cent) and the United States (35 per cent).
Ed Mayo, director of the New Economics Foundation, said: 'The analysis threw up several surprises, including Britain's better-than-average relative performance. Our findings may be controversial but they're robust. We looked at a very broad range of parameters which, taken together, do give a good idea of the nations' comparative environmental performance.'
Less developed countries such as Turkey, Spain and Portugal tended to score highly for their low air pollution, car use and refuse production, but poorly for low levels of sewage treatment and lack of nature reserves and national parks.
Germany's low ranking - seventh in the European Union, 13th among the 21 OECD nations - reflects that country's reunification. Affluent West Germany had one of the best environmental performances in Europe, East Germany with its filthy heavy industries one of the worst.
Andrew Lees, campaigns director of Friends of the Earth, described the analysis as a 'a brave effort'.
'This kind of exercise provides a crude rule of thumb but the analysis is confounded by the narrow range of indicators and doubts about the relative weight they should be given.'
Green record, page 21
(Graphic showing the Green League Table omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments