Boy, 10, says he never hit' James
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NAIVETE and repeated denials of guilt ran through the account given to police by a 10- year-old boy arrested for involvement in the killing of James Bulger, Preston Crown Court heard yesterday, writes Jonathan Foster.
After 10 interviews over three days, the boy admitted a passive role on the railway embankment in Walton, Liverpool, where the prosecution alleges that James, aged two, was stoned to death by two 10-year- olds after they abducted him from a shopping centre.
Boy A, who may not be identified for legal reasons, claimed that Boy B was responsible for striking James with bricks and an iron bar. Both deny the abduction and murder of James and attempted abduction of another child.
'I never touched him, except for picking him up . . . and seeing if he was breathing,' Boy A told police in a tape-recorded interview played to the jury.
'I know I never hit him, so I've got nothing to bother about.' Instead, it had been Boy B who 'had a smirk on his face' as James lay across a rail, apparently not breathing.
He tried to move James, but blood was pouring from a head wound, and he did not want to be covered. 'Blood stains, doesn't it, and then me mother would have to pay more money,' he said.
The police told him that James's body had been taken to hospital. Tests would be carried out, and blood had been found on Boy A's shoe.
Gradually, Boy A told police how James had been hit in the face by the first brick, in the belly by the second and struck over the head by the iron bar.
The trial was adjourned until today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments