Bill rejection deals blow to Irish poll on divorce
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
THE Irish government's plans for a divorce referendum this year were back on the drawing board yesterday after the Supreme Court rejected the Bill designed to pave its introduction, writes Alan Murdoch.
The Matrimonial Homes Bill had been put forward to eliminate fears about loss of property rights which Catholic conservatives exploited in defeating the last attempt to introduce divorce, in 1986.
The Fianna Fail-Labour coalition government had hoped that by addressing these concerns it could build a secure majority in favour of divorce in a subsequent referendum.
Yesterday's ruling followed the conclusion of the President, Mary Robinson, that the Bill could face legal obstacles. She had referred it to the Supreme Court for a legal review.
The Bill proposed to divide ownership of the home and belongings equally after a marital breakdown. It also proposed that the home and contents would be jointly owned, making one partner the sole owner if the other died.
The court yesterday ruled that automatic joint ownership could conflict with 'joint and freely made' decisions already made by the spouses. The Bill involved a 'disproportionate intervention by the state into the authority of the family'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments