Barclays blamed for suicide
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BARCLAYS BANK has been blamed by a coroner for the suicide of a financial adviser who was 'harried' over a loan repayment which would have resulted in a pounds 72 overdraft.
Steven Langley, 45, died in a fume-filled car four days after receiving two letters from the bank - one demanding he return his chequebook and card.
The bank's branch in Coventry High Street took the action because Mr Langley, of Balsall Common, West Midlands, could not meet a loan instalment after his wages were delayed. But the money had been paid in; the delay was caused by the bank's clearing system. His body was found in his car last August, along with the letters and a suicide note.
At the inquest yesterday, the Dr Richard Whittington, the Birmingham coroner, recorded a verdict of suicide and blamed the bank for 'tipping the balance'. He said: 'Mr Langley was harried in a way quite unsuitable in the circumstances for a comparatively small amount of money.'
Barclays Bank declined to comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments