Union says train safety concerns were raised years before Stonehaven crash
The Aslef union said its concerns about the High Speed Train fleet were not addressed.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A union has said it raised safety concerns about the model of train involved in the Stonehaven rail crash years before the fatal accident took place.
The Aslef train drivers’ union said its concerns about the High Speed Train (HST) rolling stock were not acted on.
On Thursday, a detailed report into the August 2020 crash was released by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB).
While the crash was caused by the train hitting gravel which had been washed onto the track, the report found the train involved was designed before modern safety standards were introduced.
It said the outcome would likely have been better if the train had met crashworthiness standards introduced in 1994.
The Daily Record reported that Aslef’s general secretary wrote to the Office of Rail and Road’s (ORR) chief inspector Ian Prosser with concerns about the ageing HST fleet.
The letter said: “At least one report produced a number of years ago assumed that the fleet would be replaced by now, and also questioned the safety of the driver if involved in a high-speed collision.
“Aslef therefore wants to see an up-to-date report on the crashworthiness of HST power cars before we agree to their operation past 2020.”
Kevin Lindsay of Aslef told the newspaper: “There was an opportunity to intervene and we were given the brush-off.
“Chief Inspector Prosser basically said the trains meet the standards and, as such, there is no issue to investigate.
“Hindsight is a wonderful science but maybe he should be looking at himself and saying: ‘Maybe we got that wrong.’
“Just because something met the safety standards when it came in doesn’t necessarily mean it should still be allowed to run 40 years later.”
Following the RAIB report on Thursday, Scotland’s Transport Minister Jenny Gilruth announced a steering group was being set up to examine the safety of older trains on Scotland’s railways, including the HST fleet.
Three people, including the train’s driver and conductor, died in the accident in August 2020.
Responding to Aslef’s comments on the 2018 letter, an ORR spokesman said: “Our thoughts remain with the families of Christopher Stuchbury, Donald Dinnie and Brett McCullough and we welcome the Rail Accident Investigation Branch report and detailed recommendations that need to be addressed with urgency.
“As the safety authority, ORR will be working rapidly with all the parties that the RAIB recommendations are directed at, to review their initial response, and lead in setting out a clear plan for how the recommendations will be addressed and action taken.
“The specific RAIB recommendations on High Speed Trains affect many parties and so we will be bringing all these organisations together as soon as possible to start a review to identify if there are reasonably practicable improvements that can be made regarding High Speed Trains.
“It is a strength of our rail system that safety standards improve over time to ensure our railway remains one of the safest in Europe.
“The arrival of a higher standard does not render earlier designs unacceptable and in 2018 we had no evidence to suggest that the High Speed Train should be subject to any review of its crashworthiness.”