Defence funding needs to increase to prevent armed forces being 'outgunned by Russians', new report claims
UK army is stretched under current funding arrangements, says Defence Committee
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UK armed forces need a significant hike in funding to tackle threats from states like Russia and fill existing "black holes" in their finances, a new parliamentary report has said.
The report from the Commons Defence Committee said the government should increase defence spending up from 2% to 3% of total GDP.
A cash injection on this scale would equate to additional funding of around £20 billion a year and bring investment in defence to levels similar to those seen in the immediate period after the end of the Cold War.
In its report, the committee warned that a failure to sustainably finance the military on a sustainable basis makes it "very difficult" to implement a long-term strategy for Britain's defence needs.
The threat from Russia - as well as challenges from new forms of warfare like cyber-terrorism - necessitates a "robust" financial new settlement, the report said.
This report comes just weeks before the expected release of high-level findings from the Ministry of Defence's Modernising Defence Programme (MDP).
In the committee's view, a lack of vehicle-mounted anti-tank weapons and "serious deficiencies in the quantities of armour, armoured vehicles and artillery" means the British Army is in danger of being "outgunned" by its Russian counterpart.
Other defence needs identified by the committee included:
- Greater anti-submarine warfare capacity;
- The generation of a Royal Navy carrier group capable of protecting the new Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers without depending on other states;
- The maintenance of the target strength of the regular Army at a minimum of 82,000 personnel;
- A layered air defence system to protect the war-fighting division.
Committee chairman Julian Lewis said: "The Secretary of State was right to remove defence from the National Security Capability Review which would otherwise have resulted in further disastrous cuts to the armed forces, and we endorse his efforts to obtain a better settlement for defence.
"The Government now needs to look beyond the 2 per cent minimum on defence spending, and begin moving towards a figure of 3 per cent, to place our defence policy on a sustainable basis to meet new threats and fill existing financial 'black holes'.
"Defence is constantly described as the first duty of government. The MDP is the government's opportunity to show that it means what it says."
Press Association
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments