Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Architect tries to win over zoo sceptics

Susan Watts
Tuesday 30 June 1992 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE AMERICAN architect behind the multi-million pound plan to transform London Zoo met staff there last night to discuss his scheme.

The ad hoc meeting with Peter Chermeyeff was the first of a series at which New Zoo Developments, the consortium led by David Laing, of the construction family, hopes to persuade sceptics that its ambitious plan is the best hope for keeping the zoo open. The plan includes a vast walk-through aquarium and Chinese-style rainforest terraces.

Meanwhile, taxi drivers and schoolchildren are to be the first targets in the other main campaign to save London Zoo. David Bellamy, the naturalist and zoo council member, yesterday launched the campaign by the London Zoo Survival Group. This represents staff from the Zoological Society of London - the zoo's parent body. The group wants the zoo to concentrate on its conservation work and use this to attract more visitors.

The survival group has a tight budget and hopes to persuade the London Taxi Drivers' Association to give it space for a sticker in every cab to advertise the zoo.

The Conservation Foundation, Professor Bellamy's campaigning organisation, also plans to include leaflets from the group in a mailshot to London schools.

Some fellows of the Zoological Society think that zoos designed by Mr Chermeyeff are not as good for the animals as they appear. The emphasis at his zoos in the United States is on providing a natural-looking setting.

But sceptics say mortality rates are high. They claim sharp metal trees at the zoos are easy to clean but have been responsible for several animals' deaths. They also claim that animals not suited to living together are often kept in the same enclosure.

Real greenery is often protected from the animals by sheets of glass or 'hot wires', the critics say, leaving frustrated animals without even the old-fashioned cardboard box or rubber tyre to play with. These would spoil the 'natural' effect for visitors.

The consortium presenting Mr Chermeyeff's design is backed by Samuel Montagu, the merchant bank, which is raising the pounds 61m that the plan requires.

Last week, representatives from the consortium met Sir John Chapple, the president of the Zoological Society. Next week it will explain its ideas to the Zoo Council, which last month voted for closure.

The Survival Group's next target is the Government. It will seek meetings with David Mellor, Secretary of State for National Heritage, and with John Major, to discuss its plans for a conservation-based zoo.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in