Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Aquarium project 'not dependent on London Zoo'

Susan Watts
Friday 18 September 1992 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DAVID LAING, the driving force behind the pounds 61m bid to revitalise London Zoo, has said he will go ahead with plans to build a national aquarium elsewhere in London if the zoo rejects his proposal.

Mr Laing has several other sites in mind, including Docklands, King's Cross and the South Bank, 'close to the tourist and entertainment circuit' of London. The move could be seen as an attempt to step up pressure on zoo leaders to opt for the Laing plan.

He has the support of Sir David Attenborough, the naturalist and broadcaster, who said: 'It would be a tremendous attraction to everybody. It would also be a way of maintaining contact with the excitement and drama of the natural world without any of the problems that make zoos aesthetically and morally objectionable to many.'

A multi-million pound hi-tech aquarium in Britain would 'teach an increasingly urbanised population about the natural world', Sir David told a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Plymouth last month.

'He has been to see us and will support us,' Mr Laing said. Sir David emphasised, however, that he would not do anything that he thought was contrary to the best interests of London Zoo.

'I would be delighted to see an aquarium in London, particularly within half a mile of Madame Tussaud's, which gets so many visitors. It's the kind of facility this country ought to have and it's certainly very terrible that it hasn't,' he said.

Mr Laing said his consortium's work on securing financiers and drawing up plans for an aquarium 'cannot go to waste'.

'We have asked in the Docklands. They were responsive, but we are not sure it's right for us,' Mr Laing said. Part of the appeal of London Zoo was that it already attracted a million visitors a year. 'It's a brilliant leisure site which is capable of doing a brilliant job.'

The aquarium is the centrepiece of the Laing plan for London Zoo, and is seen as the largest potential money-spinner for the site. Similar aquariums in Boston, New Orleans and Tokyo are hugely successful.

Mr Laing's consortium, New Zoo Developments (NZD), set up to draw up financial and development plans for the Regent's Park site, has been in touch with several developers about alternative sites.

Officials at the zoo are also considering three other bids, one from management and two put together by zoo staff. All have far more modest budgets than NZD.

Mr Laing said the other plans had much to offer, but were less financially sound. He doubted whether any of the other proposals could raise sufficient funds to pay for the zoo's maintenance and running costs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in