Police face criticism over court claims of surveillance of journalists
The NUJ and Amnesty International are among those to condemn the conduct of the PSNI outlined at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Police in Northern Ireland are facing heavy criticism following court claims that intelligence officers routinely accessed the phone data of journalists in the region.
The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) accused the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) of “shocking and despicable” behaviour.
Ian McGuinness, Irish organiser of the NUJ who attended Wednesday’s hearing of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) in London, voiced his concern at the revelations aired in court.
“It is the type of behaviour we would expect in an authoritarian state and not a modern democracy,” he said.
“Journalists exist to hold power to account and that includes writing stories about the PSNI which that force may not like.
“Writing a story about the PSNI and protecting your confidential sources whilst doing so is not a crime.
“The NUJ is calling, yet again, for the PSNI to come clean.
“In particular, the force needs to state when it started spying on multiple journalists’ phone data, who the journalists were, how many times each journalist was spied upon, and must give a commitment that it will desist from doing this ever again, simply to uncover legitimate sources for stories.”
Amnesty International also raised serious concerns about the disclosures.
Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty’s Northern Ireland programme director, said it appeared there had been “industrial-scale spying operations” against journalists.
“Today’s evidence is explosive,” he said after attending Wednesday’s hearing.
“The Investigatory Powers Tribunal has received written evidence from Durham Constabulary which points to the PSNI undertaking routine, six-monthly, industrial-scale spying operations against those it considered to be ‘trouble-making journalists’.
“This is a chilling revelation that has only emerged through lengthy court proceedings.
“That such clearly unlawful acts appear to have been custom and practice in the PSNI would demonstrate a complete contempt for the principle of press freedom. There must now be full accountability.
“It is time for the chief constable (Jon Boutcher) to come clean about the extent of police spying operations against journalists, lawyers and others.
“Meanwhile, we would urge all journalists in Northern Ireland who suspect they may have been among those targeted by the PSNI for covert surveillance to lodge complaints with the Investigatory Powers Tribunal urgently.”
SDLP leader Colum Eastwood has branded the revelations a “scandal” and called for full disclosure of the truth from the police and intelligence services involved.
Mr Eastwood, who joined reporters Barry McCaffrey and Trevor Birney at the Royal Courts of Justice for the latest hearing in the IPT case, said: “The widespread, systemic and routine surveillance of journalists and others undertaking public interest investigations in Northern Ireland has been nothing short of a scandal.
“Surveillance by police and intelligence services has been used as a form of summary punishment against those seeking to shine a light on injustice or wrongdoing and it is absolutely unacceptable.
“The process of this hearing itself has underscored the approach from state agencies, which has been to frustrate the administration of justice with late disclosures and obfuscation.
“We stand with Trevor, Barry and all those who have undertaken public interest journalism in the north – they have challenged authority and the use of power in the interests of people who often feel powerless.”