Actors sue Warner for fees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EIGHTY-NINE British actors and actresses are suing Warner Brothers Productions for failing to pay for repeat showings of five Agatha Christie films.
The television stars, including Timothy West, Dorothy Tutin and Jonathan Pryce, together with the actors' union Equity, claim Warner broke an agreement to pay extra fees if the films were shown more than three times within five years of being made.
The films, made in the early Eighties, include Murder is Easy and Dead Man's Folly. They were all successful and repeatedly shown on television. Equity says Murder is Easy was shown in 1988, 1989 and three times in 1993, and claims its members received no money for the repeats, losing thousands of pounds as a result.
Freddie Jones, who played the policeman in Murder is Easy and who is pursuing the case against Warner, said: 'Many actors and actresses rely on these residuals (repeat fees). We are hoping that these productions we did in the past will pay the rent.'
Equity and the other plaintiffs are suing Warner for damages and lost fees and are trying to force the company to account for any extra profits it made as a result of the 'unauthorised' showing of the films. They are also seeking a court ruling stating that the films were reshown without the correct authorisation and were in breach of an agreement made with the actors, plus a ruling to prevent the films being shown again without Equity's consent.
Equity issued a writ in the Chancery Division of the High Court on 30 September on Warner Brothers Productions, which has yet to respond.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments