Action urged to cut Bar students: Pupil barristers being 'set up to fail'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ACTION to limit the number of would-be barristers was urged this weekend at the Bar Conference in London. A leading barrister said that hundreds of students were being 'set up to fail'.
Nadine Radford, a member of the general council of the Bar, said examination of the numbers embarking on a career was long overdue.
'We must find a more realistic method of entry,' she said. 'We allow hundreds of students to go on believing that if they pass the exam and attend the regulation dinners they will in due course be able to practise as barristers.
'We are aware of only 500 pupillages available next year. This means we are setting people up to fail.'
Ms Radford proposed a split pupillage, with three months' pupillage, instead of the usual six months which comes after the academic qualification, being undertaken before Bar school.
This would allow the intake to be monitored and matched with current needs, as well as giving students an introduction to practice.
The profession also failed its pupils and young practitioners by not continuing the education process, she said.
Ms Radford proposed a system, similar to that operated by the Law Society, where continuing education won merit points. A number of courses had been devised, but she said: 'Those most in need of them are the most consistently absent.'
She said controlling pupils would help raise standards throughout the profession, and that more must be done to fight incompetence. She emphasised that there was no right of a tenancy for life.
'This profession has no room for unremedial incompetence,' Ms Radford said. 'We are in the best position to sort the wheat from the chaff and we must not turn a blind eye.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments