Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK tops Europe's research centres

Steve Connor
Tuesday 25 August 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITISH SCIENCE has come out top in a survey of European centres of scientific excellence.

London has beaten Paris and Moscow as the leading research centre in Europe, with scientists in the British capital publishing more high-quality research papers than any country on the Continent.

Cambridge also comes first as the place where more of the best science is produced per head of its population, compared with any other university city on this side of the Atlantic.

''The message is pride. British scientists can hold their heads up,'' said Christian Matthiessen, professor of geography at the University of Copen- hagen, who has spent over a year assessing the scientific output of 39 European centres.

Scientists in London produced nearly 65,000 research papers between 1994 and 1995, compared with nearly 46,000 by Parisian researchers and 40,000 by scientists based in Moscow.

Taking into account the differences in population size, Cambridge scientists were the most productive, publishing 81 research papers per head of the city's population. Oxford was second with 41 papers a head.

Professor Matthiessen said it was the first time anybody had tried systematically to study the relative scientific prowess of different urban centres, although companies wanted to know which city was the best for investment in research and development.

''Investors are very interested in knowing the research base of a city. They want to establish which cities are strong in a particular area,'' he said.

The Danish team spent a year defining the boundaries of different urban centres and decided that some cities, such as Amsterdam, The Hague, Rotterdam and Utrecht, were so closely integrated that they could be treated as one centre.

Urban centres, such as Oxford and Reading, Edinburgh and Glasgow and Manchester and Liverpool, came behind Berlin, but out-performed the German centres of Munich, Frankfurt and Cologne.

Professor Matthiessen said that, although London was much larger than many other capital cities in Europe, and had an inbuilt advantage of size, it would still rank highest in the league table.

''The sheer size of the research community in London is very large, but they are very productive,'' he said.

London came top in six out of ten leading categories of research, excelling in the fields of biochemistry, medicine, neuroscience, immunology, environmental sciences and biotech- nology. London scientists produced the most research papers in more than half of the 162 fields of science analysed by Professor Matthiessen.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in