Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK delays troops decision

Anthony Bevins
Tuesday 12 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

(First Edition)

THE CABINET'S Overseas Policy and Defence Committee discussed ways of defending Britons with the UN aid protection force for more than an hour at No 10 last night. But it was decided to defer action until tomorrow's full Cabinet at the earliest, writes Anthony Bevins.

Malcolm Rifkind, Secretary of State for Defence, who will make the report to the Cabinet, told the Commons yesterday that consideration of enhanced protection plans was urgent. The deferment signalled a willingness to await the response of the Bosnian-Serb 'parliament' to Radovan Karadzic's Geneva climb-down.

At Question Time, the Prime Minister told Paddy Ashdown, the Liberal Democrat leader: 'The international community will wish to apply further pressure if the Bosnian Serbs continue to reject this settlement.'

The Prime Minister's office said last night that sending defensive reinforcements would signal an expectation that imposition of the no-fly zone would be likely to lead to retaliatory attacks.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in