`Ugly' names do better at university
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BEING CALLED Gillian or Amos rather than Stephen or Alison could make the difference between getting a 2:1 and a 2:2 at university, according to a study.
Dr Phil Erwin, of Nene University College, Northampton, has found that people with unattractive or unusual names do "significantly better" at university than those with normal monikers. The downside is that Ethels or Normans can be subject to teasing for years and may "crumble" under the ridicule.
In his study, Dr Erwin looked at examinations and coursework marks for students who had completed the second year of a psychology degree at a British university as well as rating the attractiveness of their names. He said old-fashioned names such as Harold, Norman, Amos, Gillian, Ethel and Pauline were seen as unattractive whereas the more modern Stephen, David, Lucy, Alison and Emma are marked out as attractive.
On average those with names rated as "unattractive" scored at least 3 per cent more. "It may not sound much but in degree classifications it can make the difference between a good and an average degree," said Dr Erwin. "It can make the difference between a 2:1 and a 2:2 or even a 2:1 and a first."
He said the names he looked at were more old fashioned than unusual, and so the effect could be even more marked for someone with a truly outlandish name. "When people have a name that is unattractive it makes you stand out," said Dr Erwin. "It focuses attention on you and people either crumble or do extremely well."
Children who have such names may often have to endure playground teasing and if they survive that they have worked out a survival mechanism for life. "Children are merciless about differences and if you are called Norman you are going to be at the receiving end of a lot of ribbing," said Dr Erwin. "It either toughens you up or you become miserable."
He added: "If you are asked out on a blind date with someone called Norman or Ethel or Stephen or Alison, you would be more likely to accept with the latter names."
The advantage of an unattractive name might also help in the job market, drawing you to the attention of an employer.
However, Dr Erwin said he would not advise parents to saddle their child with an unattractive name in the hopes of them becoming an academic achiever. "Fashions in names do change," he said. "The best thing is to give them two names and then they can decide which one they want to use."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments