Typing error cost Lockheed pounds 43m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UNITED STATES defence giant Lockheed Martin lost $70m (pounds 43m) because of a typing error in one of its contracts, it was reported yesterday.
The error in a crucial clause in an international sales contract was a comma in a set of figures. It was moved accidentally by one decimal point.
The client insisted Lockheed honoured its contract to the letter and the defence group was left nursing the multi-million loss.
James Blackwell, president of Lockheed's aeronautics division, was quoted as saying: "That comma cost Lockheed 70 million dollars." The deal was for an order for Lockheed's latest version of the Hercules transport plane used by air forces around the world. While the identity of the client was not revealed only three non-US governments have placed contracts for the new Hercules - Australia, Italy and Britain.
A spokesman for Lockheed declined to comment on the report, adding that Mr Blackwell was "in the air right now" and could not be contacted.
Lockheed Martin reported total profits for 1998 of around $1bn (pounds 625m).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments