Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

TUC considers pounds 3.65 minimum wage

Barrie Clement
Sunday 28 April 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tony Blair looks set to go into the general election unencumbered with controversial union demands for a high national minimum wage - potentially one of the most sensitive issues, writes Barrie Clement.

A confidential TUC document suggests a much lower limit than the sum backed by most unions and even questions whether they should tie the Labour Party to any figure.

Union leaders are also asked to consider whether a minimum rate should be "phased in".

The new mood at the top of the union movement will be seen as a critical victory for Mr Blair over "old Labour" and will undermine Conservative allegations that a minimum wage will destroy jobs.

While the union movement publicly endorses a rate set at half male median earnings, calculated at pounds 4.26 an hour, a paper prepared for the TUC favours an interpretation of the formula yielding pounds 3.65.

TUC officials would prefer to see no figure mentioned because they believe a sum below pounds 4 would be difficult to get through Congress and any figure above would embarrass Mr Blair.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in