Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Training chiefs' pounds 1 liability attacked

Chris Blackhurst
Wednesday 24 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CHRIS BLACKHURST

An all-party committee of MPs yesterday expressed "grave concern" that directors of Training and Enterprise Councils - private companies set up with more than pounds 1.4bn of taxpayers' money to manage young people's training - have a personal liability of just pounds 1 each in the event of failure.

The criticism from the Commons Public Accounts Committee, which has a majority of Tory members, comes in the wake of the collapse of the TEC in South Thames.

Stephen Byers, Labour's education and employment spokesman, called for changes in the accountability of TEC directors. "It is simply unacceptable that people responsible for spending such large sums of public money have personal liability of just pounds 1," he said. "Changes must be introduced which will ensure that directors are held liable for reckless spending."

In the case of South Thames, the chief executive, Michael Hanson, retired because of ill-health. Soon after the board agreed to make him an ex gratia payment of pounds 30,375. "Would the directors of South Thames have acted in this cavalier way if they could be held personally responsible for such spending?", Mr Byers asked.

Another area that caused the committee disquiet was the accumulating by the TECs of hundreds of millions of pounds in reserves.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in