Tory MPs to let rest of party vote for leader
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tory MPs are balloting today on the way they select their next leader after William Hague. Colin Brown, Chief Political Correspondent, says they are likely to support a system that could have given former Chancellor Ken Clarke victory over Mr Hague.
Conservative MPs are poised to throw away their most important power by giving up their exclusive right to choose their leader in favour of one member, one vote (Omov) democracy in the Tory party.
The change may be enough to have older Tories choking on their pink gins. Right wing party activists who oppose a ballot of the whole party to choose the next leader said last night it would have meant that Kenneth Clarke would have beaten William Hague for the leadership and Margaret Thatcher would never have been chosen.
"You will just get the most famous of the candidates. The party would have been stuck with Ken Clarke. Heseltine could have won. But Thatcher would never have been selected," said a right wing Tory activist.
It is unclear whether OMOV would give Chris Patten the edge in a leadership election over Michael Portillo. Both would first have to win seats at Westminster and Mr Hague will not go before the next election, but the change has added spice to the speculation in the Tory party about their possible return.
The party in the country is keen to assert its rights after the 1 May electoral disaster, for which the MPs bore the brunt of the blame. The Conservative Democratic Movement claimed yesterday that a survey showed a clear majority in favour of Omov.
The survey also showed that ordinary members found Tory Central Office remote and bureaucratic. Mr Hague has made it clear that he supports Omov for the future.
The grass roots campaign for change gained momentum when Archie Hamilton, chairman of the 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers, did a U-turn and backed Omov with the executive and a majority of the committee in a letter to Tory MPs.
The MPs have a range of options, but they are being urged to back a system in which a challenge could be mounted after a vote of no confidence; that would trigger a primary leadership contest among the MPs to weed out the wild cards before allowing a shortlist to go before the full membership.
Archie Norman, vice-chairman of the party, also now supports Omov. John Horam, a former minister, and Richard Ottoway, a Tory spokesman on London, are campaigning for the system in tomorrow's ballot and are confident of victory.
It is part of a consultation exercise on Blueprint for Change, a reform green paper which opposed Omov.
Tory chairmen are meeting in London on 17 January to discuss their response to the document for final agreement at a conference in the spring.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments