Tories drop protest on rights law plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Conservative Party has dropped its opposition to government plans to incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into British law, it emerged last night.
The issue is the first of many on which the new Opposition must decide how to react to the plans of the Labour government. Many Tory MPs believe that they cannot continue to peddle the set of policies on which they lost the election so drastically.
The move followed a row in the Shadow Cabinet during which Michael Howard, the former home secretary, argued that the party's earlier stance on the subject should be maintained.
Mr Howard lost the argument, and the Opposition's amendment to the proposal in the Queen's Speech to incorporate the convention was very mild on the subject. It said the Opposition believed "that the implications of the Government's proposal to incorporate the European Convention on Human Rights into British law should be carefully examined."
But Mr Howard, who closed the Home Affairs debate in the House of Commons for the Opposition earlier this week, took a slightly stronger line.
"We are not persuaded that incorporating the Convention into British law is either necessary or desirable," he said. "Incorporation would mean that judges might find themselves having to make what are essentially political decisions. In any event, human rights in Britain are not under threat, even after the election of a Labour government, but the sovereignty of Parliament is under threat and incorporation of the Convention would be a further blow to that sovereignty."
He quoted the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine of Lairg, as saying that the move would involve a very significant transfer of power to the judges. Some Conservative backbenchers also oppose the change of policy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments