Threats force British embassy closures
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITAIN AND America have temporarily closed several embassies in Africa, fearing a repeat of the bombings which last year destroyed the US posts in Kenya and Tanzania.
The Foreign Office yesterday closed the missions in Gambia, Madagascar, Namibia and Senegal, saying it had evidence of a possible threat. "We are taking this threat seriously and have taken the precautionary measure of temporarily closing our missions in these countries," said a spokesman. On Thursday America closed its posts in the same countries and in Liberia and Togo, where Britain has no embassies.
The Foreign Office said there was no risk to Britons in the countries. "The possible threat is to diplomatic missions, not to British nationals," said the spokesman.
American intelligence officials have warned in the last week that they expect an imminent attack on US facilities. They claim to have information from telephone intercepts and other methods of planning for an attack. They blame last year's embassy bombings on Osama bin Laden, the wealthy Saudi who has called for Britain and America to leave the Gulf.
"We don't take a decision to close an embassy lightly," said State Department spokesman Jamie Rubin. "We [developed] information that suspicious individuals were known to be engaged in surveillance of certain embassies."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments