Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Scotsmen await their Sassenach king

Rob Brown
Thursday 23 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A young Englishman is being parachuted into one of the most sensitive posts in Scottish journalism. Martin Clark, 32, was yesterday appointed editor of the Scotsman, whose oak-panelled corridors have been filled with apprehension since the New Year return of the ex-Sunday Times editor Andrew Neil to his native land.

Mr Neil, now editor-in-chief of the Edinburgh broadsheet and its sister titles, Scotland on Sunday and the European, passed over several in-house applicants, including the deputy editor Alan Taylor, in favour of Clark, a stern young southerner who was dispatched north of the Border by the Daily Mail less than two years ago to edit its fledgling Scottish edition.

Staff on the Scotsman are anxious not only that they might be served their P45s in a brutal shake-up, but also that the paper will start to shed some of its passion for a Scottish parliament in the run-up to the general election and in any subsequent devolution referendum.

Although it has played down some of its parent paper's Middle England prejudices, the Scottish Daily Mail has railed against a Scottish parliament. Mr Neil has done the same throughout his journalistic career. He even established a separate Scottish section during his editorship of the Sunday Times to challenge the pro-Home Rule consensus in his native land.

Mr Clark denied last night that the Scotsman would lurch to the right under his editorship. "There will be no change in our line on devolution. The paper has been supportive of devolution and will remain supportive," he said. "The only caveat I would add is that we'll be asking some harder questions about the proposals than have been asked in the past."

In crude circulation terms that venture can point to some success. Magnus Linklater, editor from 1988 to 1994, described Mr Clark as "an interesting and unexpected choice" for the editorship.

He added: "the Scotsman's role in the run-up to the election will be crucial not only for its readership but for Scottish politics. Any editor needs to be aware of the paper's strong radical traditions and treat them with care. Otherwise he might risk alienating a loyal but vociferous readership."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in