The Queen's Speech: Industrial Relations - Union recognition rules presage battles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE BRIEF reference to government plans for "fairness at work" masks the vicious private battles that have been taking place over compulsory union recognition.
Unions insist that the proposals should not be watered down, but employers are keen that safeguards are introduced to the Fairness at Work Bill to ensure that recognition should be granted only where support from the workforce is long-standing and overwhelming.
The address referred to ministers' keenness to work in partnership with business and it welcomed improved relations between employers and unions, "who are working together in informing the Government's proposals for fairness at work".
In fact, the two sides of industry have been at daggers drawn over a plan to award automatic recognition where more than half a workforce are union members.
Under pressure from the Confederation of British Industry, the Downing Street Policy Unit has urged that workers should be members of a union for at least 12 months before they are counted towards recognition.
Unions argued, however, that there should not be two classes of union members, and that such an amendment would render the law useless because of labour turnover, and the possibility that employers would persuade workers to leave unions, or dismiss trade unionists.
Unions believe they havesuccessfully resisted the idea of a two- tier membership, but they may have lost another battle. The Fairness at Work White Paper, published earlier this year, suggested that the upper limit on the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal be removed. After representation from employers' leaders, however, the present pounds 12,000 cap is likely to be increased to pounds 40,000 or pounds 50,000.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments