Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Testimony 'risk for presidents'

Mary Dejevsky
Wednesday 17 June 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A GROUP of former American secret service agents has told a United States appeals court that a president's security could be jeopardised to the point where he risks assassination if members of Bill Clinton's security detail are required to testify.

The view of the 12 agents, all of whom once guarded presidents, was contained in a document submitted to the appeal judge last week, but made public only yesterday.

The agents, quoted by their lawyers, said that it was their unanimous view that obliging agents to testify would "lead inexorably to the successful assassination of another American president in our lifetime". It would threaten "the safety of all future as well as living former presidents". Their argument is that a President would be reluctant to give secret service agents the access and proximity they need to guard him effectively, if he thought that they might be potential witnesses against him. The same point was made recently by former President Bush.

The appeals court is considering whether agents should be forced to testify before a grand jury in the Monica Lewinsky case. Ms Lewinsky is alleged to have had an affair with President Clinton when a White House trainee, and to have lied about it under oath.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in