Television reporter cleared of contempt charge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The trial of a Granada television reporter charged with contempt for refusing to disclose sources to a judicial tribunal collapsed yesterday after a judge ruled that her own words could not be used as the sole case against her.
Judge Dominic Lynch directed the jury to acquit Susan O'Keeffe after ruling that prosecution witnesses had not shown she had refused to answer a question put to her by the tribunal of inquiry into the Irish beef industry in December 1992.
Ms O'Keeffe, 34, researched the 1991 World in Action investigation into the Irish beef conglomerate Goodman International and allegations of political favours and fraud in the beef industry. She initially faced three contempt charges, two of which were dropped.
Ms O'Keeffe, the only person to have been charged as a result of the three-year tribunal, had been asked to provide a list of names and addresses of those she interviewed for the report.
The court was told the law on judicial inquiries directed that a witness's voluntary testimony could not be used against them as evidence. Kevin Haugh, for the defence, said the evidence showed only omission of information, not refusal to answer.
When the prosecution called the tribunal registrar it emerged that his evidence was based solely on Ms O'Keeffe's own words. The judge rejected an attempt to amend the charge and ordered the jury to acquit her.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments