Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Talks stumble on problem of IRA arms

Donald Macintyre
Wednesday 22 May 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The British and Irish governments will meet again early next week in an effort to close what is still a serious gap between them over how to handle the crucial issue of IRA arms decommissioning in the all-party talks planned for 10 June.

Officials are to resume talks after a ministerial meeting failed to resolve outstanding differences - including over the role of US Senator George Mitchell in the talks and whether he should have a wider remit than purely on the decommissioning of arms.

Earlier David Trimble, leader of the Ulster Unionist Party, had staked out his ground with a warning that he could yet be prepared to see the Government fall.

The UUP leader said that John Major's Government "need not look to us for support" if it started to backslide on the key issue of requiring IRA weapons to be decommissioned as the talks progressed.

Pressed on what was the main stumbling block between the two governments, Sir Patrick Mayhew, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, implied it was the crucial question of whether some arms decommissioning should take place during the talks, as the Mitchell report suggested, or whether it should be after the talks process was completed, as Dublin had originally insisted.

Sir Patrick emphasised that Britain had already compromised on its previous insistence that some decommissioning should take place before the talks, and added that there had been differences over whether some decommissioning should begin "during the course of the talks or perhaps at the end or thereafter".

That interpretation was quickly contested by Irish sources who were insistent that both sides were agreed on the Mitchell report's proposal that some decommissioning should take place during talks. At issue instead was Dublin's desire to ensure that talks did not get bogged down by the arms issue to the exclusion of all other topics.

There appeared last night to be agreement that with the talks broken into three "strands" - internal political arrangements for Northern Ireland, cross-border "North-South" issues, and "East-West" Anglo-Irish relationships - decommissioning should be dealt with by a sub-committee of the second strand.

But sources close to yesterday's meeting said that the British had been pressing for Senator Mitchell's role to be confined to chairing the sub- committee on decommissioning while the Irish would like him to have a wider political role as well as chairman of all the "North-South" talks.

Both Sir Patrick and Dick Spring, the Irish Foreign Minister, stressed that the meeting had been - in Sir Patrick's words - "hard-working, productive and friendly".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in