Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Straw backtracks on deaths in custody inquiry

Fran Abrams Westminster Correspondent
Friday 19 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JACK STRAW has backtracked on a promise to hold a public inquiry into deaths in custody and has failed to publish a report that severely criticises the way such cases are investigated.

The Home Secretary will face fierce criticism on the issue next week from the Liberal Democrats, who hope to force through a measure to make the police complaints procedure independent.

The controversy follows a number of high-profile cases in which an inquest jury, or the High Court, found a detainee had been unlawfully killed but no charges or disciplinary action were brought.

Mr Straw has broken with established practice by not publishing a report from the European Committee on the Prevention of Torture, which reviewed the cases. It is believed to have called for changes to the police complaints procedure.

The committee, which oversees the European anti- torture convention and which visited Britain in September 1997, says nearly all its reports are published by the government concerned. The Conservatives published every report that concerned them.

The evidence heard by the committee centred on three cases. The first was that of Richard O'Brien, who died after being arrested for being drunk and disorderly in 1994. An inquest found he was unlawfully killed, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) twice declined to act against three Metropolitan policemen. A case was brought this year after Mr O'Brien's family went to judicial review. The officers were acquitted.

In the second case, also in 1994, Shiji Lapite, a Nigerian aged 34 seeking asylum, died after a struggle with police in which his larynx was crushed and his head battered. An inquest jury found he had been unlawfully killed. There was no trial even after an inquiry into why the CPS did not prosecute.

The committee also heard about the case of Derek Treadaway, who successfully sued the West Midlands Police for pounds 50,000 after being forced to confess to robbery by having a plastic bag placed over his head. He was jailed for 15 years in 1982 and even when his conviction was quashed in 1996 no charges were brought.

Dame Barbara Mills, when Director of Public Prosecutions, set up an inquiry into the CPS role in the case, but it concluded last year there was not enough evidence to prosecute. Weeks later, Mr Treadaway was found dead in Amsterdam.

Simon Hughes, Liberal Democrat home affairs spokes-man, said his party was anxious to see independent investigation of complaints against the police and would try to amend a forthcoming CPS Bill to make that body's complaints procedure more independent.

In April, Mr Straw said he was considering holding a public inquiry into deaths in custody but a Home Office spokesman said yesterday that instead the department preferred to focus on improved training, safer facilities, more monitoring and better understanding of drug and alcohol problems.

The spokesman said the report had not yet been published because the Metropolitan Police had objected to the committee about some of its evidence but that it was hoped the matter would soon be resolved.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in