Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE PRIME Minister has ordered ministers to stop announcing Government spending commitments over and over again.
His edict comes after a series of high-profile gaffes involving ministers, or their spin doctors, re-telling the same story about spending as if it were new.
Ministers will not be allowed to talk about "new" money unless it is actually new. Instead they must use the formula: "This is money announced in the Comprehensive Spending Review which had not previously been allocated."
The move comes after senior ministers were caught out announcing funding several times over.
Whitehall insiders say the Prime Minister and his official spokesman, Alastair Campbell, are no longer prepared to put up with the embarrassment - or the bad press - that the practice is causing.
One said: "There is a feeling that the spin has gone too far and people have started to get their fingers burned for allowing an impression to be left that money already announced is new money."
The Minister of Agriculture, Nick Brown, was recently rebuked by MPs for misleading farmers over an aid package.
Mr Brown had told embattled farmers that they would receive pounds 150m in direct aid. But it emerged later that only pounds 1m of that amount was "new" money. In fact pounds 89m was from deferred cattle passport charges, which farmers would not have to pay, and pounds 60m was a grant to hill farmers, first announced last year. The only new money was pounds 1m for marketing schemes.
Mr Brown was accused of giving farmers "false hope" as the beef crisis continued.
The Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, was also accused of re-announcing cash for transport policies when he said there would be an pounds 80bn 10-year transport programme - but neglected to add that much of the money was "old money" for projects that had already been announced, including the Channel Tunnel and part of Railtrack's own 10-year pounds 27bn investment programme.
The rest of the funding would come from public-private sector partnerships such as the profits from privatising the National Air Traffic Systems, windfalls from the working-place levies and congestion charging, and the ring-fenced proceeds of the fuel escalator.
The practice, which some MPs believe has been going on across government since Labour came to office, has infuriated the Opposition.
A Conservative Party spokesman said last night: "Time after time we have seen government ministers supposedly announcing programmes and spending commitments which have already been unveiled to the country many times before.
"In our survey of so-called government announcements we even found one education commitment that in one way or another had been trailed 16 times before.
"The Government should concentrate less on presenting their policies to the country and more on the substance of what they are seeking to do."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments