Stockmarket figures just don't add up for Beardstown Ladies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A CHERISHED fantasy of America's share-owning democracy - that amateur investors can be as savvy as the professionals - has just come crashing down with an apology from the good ladies of Beardstown, Illinois, that they made a mistake, writes Mary Dejevsky.
The Beardstown Ladies, average age 70, gained a reputation over the years for a commonsensical, mid-Western approach to small investment that claimed returns competitive with, and often superior to, those of the big stockbrokers.
The 14 members of the Beardstown Business and Professional Women's Investment Club devised a recipe for "stock-picking" that, according to their calculations, yielded a 10-year return on investments of more than 23 per cent. That compared with a 12 per cent increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the same period.
The professionals checked the figures. Alas for the ladies, their claim did not add up. The professionals found that the real return over the relevant period, the 10 years to 1993, was 9.3 per cent.
Now, Betty Sinnock, the club's treasurer, has issued an apology: "The Ladies were very concerned that the public would think we had purposely misrepresented results in any of our books," she said in a statement. "We shared this original rate of return in good faith and are terribly sorry for the error and the confusion it may have caused."
Perhaps the Ladies should not be too distraught. Their 23 per cent yield did happen, in 1991-92, and according to a professional audit by Price Waterhouse, their rate of return for the 14 years of their club's existence has been 15.3 per cent: respectably in line with mutual fund yields over the same period.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments