Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Steel works threatened by merger

Diane Coyle
Sunday 06 June 1999 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MEMBERS OF the Welsh Assembly may ask competition authorities in Brussels to investigate a proposed merger between British Steel and Hoogovens, the Dutch steelmaker.

Rhodri Morgan, the Assembly's industrial development secretary, said yesterday the deal, whose details are due to be announced this morning, inevitably posed a threat to the future of the British Steel works at Llanwern and Port Talbot in South Wales. "We will ask the competition authorities in Brussels to look at whether there is a case for referral," he said.

British Steel would not comment yesterday on the merger terms. It is believed that no plant closures were involved but unions fear the deal could imply several thousand additional job cuts on top of the 10,000 redundancies over the next two years already agreed with British Steel. With losses likely to reach pounds 200m this year as a result of the strong pound, the company is seeking savings of around pounds 200m a year from the merger.

Mr Morgan said: "I don't see how you get cost savings of that much just from closing down the odd warehouse. We want to know what is the commercial logic of this deal." The merger will be debated in the Assembly tomorrow. The two South Wales plants, both of which which make flat-sheet steel, have borne the brunt of corporate cost-cutting so far. The fact that its output is largely UK-based is what has made British Steel, one of Britain's biggest exporters, so vulnerable to the strength of the pound.

Hoogovens has an ultra-efficient low-cost flat steel plant at Ijmuiden in the Netherlands which is the same size as the South Wales steelworks put together. Mr Morgan said what suited British Steel was the fit between this Dutch site, which already exported all over Europe, and its English works at Scunthorpe and Redcar.

"You have to ask where does that leave the Welsh part of British Steel," he said. Any closures or job cuts in Wales will be all the more controversial as the merger is expected to return up to pounds 600m to shareholders through a special dividend or share buyback, somewhat more than initially expected.

The share prices of both companies have made large gains during the past week. John Bryant, the chief executive of British Steel, is expected to share the top job at the merged company with Fokko van Duyn, his Dutch counterpart. There is speculation the company will drop the "British" from its name. It will be the world's third biggest steelmaker after Posco of Korea and Nippon Steel of Japan, with sales of around pounds 10bn a year and 70,000 employees.

British Steel executives are due to meet union leaders tomorrow to discuss the implications of the merger - in effect a takeover of Hoogovens, which has annual sales about half the size of British Steel's and a stockmarket value just over a quarter of its partner's. Michael Leahy, general secretary of the main steel union, the Iron and Steel Trades Confederation, said yesterday: "The merger need not result in any plant closures. British Steel is already a fit and lean company and is one of the most productive and profitable in the world."

Denis MacShane, chairman of the steel group of MPs and Labour member for Rotherham, said it was not inevitable that jobs would be lost. "Anyone with any interest in the future of British Steel must welcome the fact that the company has got a serious partner in a major EU country," he said. "There obviously are staffing implications for British Steel and it is necessary that this is handled with a great deal of sensitivity."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in