Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

`Standards are not high enough'

Judith Judd
Tuesday 07 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A leading professor of education last night accused Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools of not being tough enough on low standards and bad maths teaching.

Professor Peter Mortimore, new director of London University's Institute of Education, said figures in the chief inspector's report showed that nearly a third of lessons for 7 to 11-year-olds were not up to scratch.

However, Chris Woodhead, the chief inspector, said last week that standards were rising because of government reforms.

Mr Mortimore, whose research has been widely quoted by education ministers, said in his inaugural lecture: "My view is that we have simply not raised standards high enough. I appear to be more worried about standards than he is."

The Office for Standards in Education, which Mr Woodhead heads, was not severe enough on poor maths teaching, Mr Mortimore said. Unlike Mr Woodhead, he did not argue that trendy teachers who refused to use whole-class teaching were the main reason for low standards.

Instead, Mr Mortimore said that primary school teachers' lack of knowledge, particularly of maths, was one of the main reasons for the problem.

"Our recent research evidence shows that the years of junior schooling are important for the whole school career. Yet we know that in many primary schools the subject is being taught by teachers who not only lack formal qualifications but who are, in certain cases, insecure in their grasp of basic principles."

Mr Mortimore called for a new emphasis in schools on maths and reading, but added that this should not be achieved at the expense of a broad curriculum.

Policy-makers, he argued, should use the services of university researchers more, and researchers should learn more about schools instead of concentrating on esoteric debates that did nothing to improve teaching or learning.

n Some 700 jobs have been lost in the past two years because of cuts in funding for ethnic minorities, according to a survey released yesterday. A further 637 are at risk this year, says the Commission for Racial Equality and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers.

The study shows that teachers are convinced of the value of Home Office funds for ethnic minority English language teaching - section 11 grants - in raising standards and combating racism.

Herman Ouseley, the commission's chairman, said: "It will be a sad waste if the Government fails to realise that real progress has been made with this particular educational policy.

"There is growing concern that some ethnic minority children will no longer have full access to the national curriculum."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in