Space: Astronauts to rescue satellite
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NASA managers were deciding last night whether to have astronauts from the Columbia shuttle attempt a risky plan to grab a tumbling, one- and-a-half-ton satellite.
Columbia's crew accidentally sent the $10m Spartan satellite into a spin on Friday and now managers may ask astronauts Winston Scott and Takao Doi to rescue it in an already scheduled spacewalk tonight.
They have been trained in the technique for seizing satellites. But no one expected it to be spinning, so the men practised catching only a relatively still spacecraft.
Although it has been more than five years since astronauts last hauled in a satellite by hand, Scott said: "I feel pretty confident that we can pull it off and pull it off safely."
The satellite had failed to make a slow turn as expected following its release and one of the astronauts tried to latch on to the satellite again with the robot arm, the craft began tumbling an estimated 2 degrees a second - too fast for her to snag.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments