Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Social Security: Tories accuse ministers of going soft on housing fraud

Paul Waugh
Wednesday 13 January 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MINISTERS WERE accused last night of "outrageous" laxity toward benefit crime after it emerged that newly introduced government guidelines had led to a sharp fall in fraud detection across the country.

Housing benefit fraud investigators have estimated that they will lose up to pounds 200ma year because of a little-known circular issued by the Department of Social Security.

Town halls are reporting a 60 per cent drop in the level of fraud detection as a result of the new DSS rules that tightened the rules of evidence. Until last year, a "balance of probabilities" system operated and investigators could suspend benefit on suspicion of illegality and provide concrete proof later.

The DSS circular informed councils that they would no longer be compensated for money lost to fraudsters unless they provided surveillance and other evidence to prove that the fraud was deliberate.

Councils claim that the Government has "changed the goalposts" in a bid to save itself millions of pounds while claiming that fraud was dropping. Anti-fraud units across the UK claim the new system penalises them and could result in job losses or rises in council tax.

Senior Tories are set to raise the issue in the Commons today, when they will claim the circular proves that ministerial rhetoric on tackling fraud is not matched by reality. Iain Duncan Smith, the Conservative social security spokesman, said that the DSS change was an "outrageous" example of the Government watering down the campaign against fraud.

"We always worried that Labour was soft on benefit crime and this proves it. This circular is a politically motivated sleight of hand to save the department millions," he said.

Mr Duncan Smith claimedthat the Social Security minister Angela Eagle had misled the House of Commons on Monday when she denied that anti-fraud strategies had been watered down.

Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Social Security, denied the Tory charges last night. "Since I arrived at the DSS, I have ended the `money for nothing' culture. The new system of housing benefit fraud targets produces real fraud savings not fictional ones. In the next few weeks I shall be making a major announcement on my anti-fraud strategy."

A spokeswoman for the DSS said that the changes had been introduced after claims that some councils had been over-claiming the level of fraud in their area. pounds 100m was being directed into improving fraud prevention for local authorities. The total amount of money saved by local authority fraud investigation units in 1997-98 was pounds 342m, with the majority of town halls saving nearly pounds 2m each on average.

The National Audit Office reported this week that there was "no evidence of any improvement" in stemming the losses from benefit fraud suffered by councils.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in