Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sleep tight ... in a British bed you've no choice

Kathy Marks
Saturday 26 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

They did things differently in Tudor times. The 1595 Great Bed of Ware, now in the Victoria and Albert Museum, is 10ft 8in wide, amply proportioned to accommodate four people comfortably.

Nowadays 80 per cent of British adults who sleep with a partner occupy a space a few inches wider than a baby's cot. A survey has found that our standard double beds - 4ft 6in wide by 6ft 3in long - are the smallest in the world. Only Americans, - surprisingly, given obesity levels across the Atlantic - share our sardine-can tastes. Belgian, Finnish and Swiss couples luxuriate in beds measuring 5ft 3in by 6ft 7in. Even the Japanese, not renowned for their stature, surpass us in sleeping space: 4ft 7in by 6ft 5in.

There was an initial thrill of excitement when the research was published by the Sleep Council, mouthpiece of bed manufacturers and retailers. Did it prove, perhaps, that our famous froideur was a myth, that we harboured passions so fiery that only the narrowest of beds afforded the requisite proximity?

Sadly, no, according to Kevin Morgan, a psychologist at the University of Sheffield. "There is a kind of iconography of the bed as a place for sex," he says. "But since most of the population is in the passion-spent bracket, issues of amorousness do not arise.

"Even those of the rabbit tendency will not spend hours every night utilising a full 6ft width of bed. Anyway, libidinous stimulation requires some kind of tactile contact, and the bigger the bed, the farther you are apart."

The truth, Dr Morgan believes, is more prosaic. "We live in small houses, with shoebox-sized bedrooms, so naturally our beds are similarly sized. We are also small-minded people, and take the view that if 4ft 6in was good enough for our parents, it's good enough for us."

Indeed, this attitude characterised reaction recently to news that Tony and Cherie Blair had celebrated their move to Downing Street by splashing out pounds 3,500 on a hand-built 6ft by 6ft 7in Swedish bed. Critics condemned them for rank extravagance.

Perhaps their example will help to liberate us from our quaint attachment to frugally proportioned divans. The hotel industry's announcement last month that single beds are to be phased out - due to lack of demand - suggests our tastes may be becoming more adventurous. Certainly, our miserliness infuriates Andy Hills of the London Bedding Company, proud owner of a 5ft-wide bed. "Size is essential for a good night's sleep," he says. "We need the space to thrash around."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in