Silcott claims he was politically exploited
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WINSTON SILCOTT today launches a bitter attack on the judicial system, the police and the media, claiming he was 'politically exploited' after the murder of PC Keith Blakelock 'to relieve pressure off (sic) the police and the higher authorities'.
In a letter to the Independent received a day after details emerged of his pounds 10,000 false imprisonment award, Silcott claims he suffered fresh vilification last week when two officers were cleared of fabricating evidence against him.
'What people of this country don't want to admit is that I am totally innocent of PC Blakelock's death and not guilty of Anthony Smith's murder,' he writes. 'To put it bluntly, a black person can be innocent.'
News of Silcott's award caused outrage yesterday because he is serving a life sentence for the murder of Anthony Smith, a north London gang leader, whom he says he stabbed in self-defence. His solicitor, Adrian Clarke, argued that the award was compensation for five months he served on remand for the killing of PC Blakelock, a crime the Court of Appeal accepted in 1991 that he did not commit.
Last week, Detective Chief Superintendent Graham Melvin and Detective Inspector Maxwell Dingle were cleared of fabricating evidence against Silcott. During their trial, the court was told that Electrostatic Document Analysis (Esda) tests showed discrepancies in notes of an interview with Silcott after PC Blakelock's murder.
'There is nothing wrong with the Esda test,' Silcott writes. 'When the police want to convict people by using the Esda test, then the Esda test is the best . . . (It) has only been rubbished because it blatantly exposes normal police practice.'
He says: 'The real fact behind my invalid incarceration is that I have been politically exploited to relieve the pressure off the police and higher authorities' backs.'
Letters, page 13
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments