Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Showdown for Sinn Fein over place in peace talks

Kim Sengupta
Sunday 15 February 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE IRISH peace process will today face its severest test when the parties gather in Dublin to consider whether Sinn Fein should be expelled from the talks after the recent republican killings.

Unionist parties are clamouring for the removal of the republicans after last week's Royal Ulster Constabulary declaration that the IRA was involved in the killings of a loyalist figure and a suspected drug dealer.

Sinn Fein leader Martin McGuinness warned yesterday that expelling his party from the talks could mean shutting the door permanently to its return to the negotiating table."We could conceivably have a situation where people out there, who are attempting to destroy the peace process and any hope of a negotiated settlement, could conspire to create circumstances which would make it impossible for Sinn Fein to get back to these talks.

"This is a very dangerous and very grim situation".

Mr McGuinness also accused the Government of double standards, saying that when in May last year RUC Chief Constable Ronnie Flanagan declared that a number of loyalist paramilitary groups had broken the ceasefire, no attempt was made to expel their political representatives from the talks.

The Unionist parties are demanding Sinn Fein's expulsion for the IRA's alleged involvement in the murders in Belfast of loyalist Bobby Dougan and drug-dealer Brendan Campbell.

Four men will appear in a Belfast court today charged with murdering Mr Dougan. Last week, police held up to seven men, with RUC sources describing some of the men held as IRA suspects.

The Northern Ireland Secretary, Mo Mowlam, said yesterday: "In peace talks, no one wants to negotiate with a gun at their heads.

"That is why the Northern Ireland talks process is only open to those committed to the principles of peace and democracy."

The Irish Prime Minister, Bertie Ahern, issued a clear warning that Sinn Fein's place was in jeopardy.

The rules governing the talks were set down, he said. "If the facts are such that the IRA are involved, then it is a very serious matter - and the process is fairly clear."

Seamus Mallon, deputy leader of the SDLP, said he would wait to hear the evidence from Ms Mowlam but insisted the integrity of the talks had to be protected.

A decision which was morally and democratically right had to be taken. "We are all going to have to walk a tightrope. We have got to do the proper thing, we have got to do the right thing.

"If that proper thing and right thing takes a certain amount of courage, then we will have to show the courage."

Sinn Fein says it should not be expelled from the talks because IRA involvement has not been proved.

Two different standards of proof have been mooted: the written rules of procedure lay down that parties may be ejected if they have "demonstrably dishonoured" the Mitchell principles of non violence. Ms Mowlam is said to have decided, when dealing with the case of loyalists, that proof should be "incontrovertible". Yesterday there was controversy over which of these principles should be applied.

Comment, page 15

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in