Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Shot in the arm for birth control

Liz Hunt,Medical Correspondent
Tuesday 03 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A CONTRACEPTIVE implant which works for up to five years will become available in Britain this autumn. Its use in the United States has caused controversy, with claims that it is targeted at an 'underclass' of teenage mothers and the poor from ethnic minorities.

Norplant, the most reliable contraceptive method to date, is also reversible within 24 hours of removal. Family planning experts said it is 'probably the perfect method of contraception' for young women. It will be available only on prescription, from family planning clinics and GPs who perform minor surgery.

But in America, where the implant has been available since 1990 and is used by 600,000 women, it is fast becoming a civil rights issue. Some judges appear to be adopting its use as a part of punishment for women who abuse their children. High schools in Los Angeles and Baltimore provide it for pupils.

Although Britain has one of the highest rates of young, single mothers in Europe, experts are confident that Norplant will not attract the same controversy. The Family Planning Association said: 'It will be very sad if women are put off it because of this. There are very different attitudes here, and it is an issue of consent.'

Ann Furedi, of the Birth Control Trust, said a more pressing issue was whether Norplant would be available on the NHS. The Government is expected to ban some more expensive contraceptives this year. No price has been set by Roussel, the company behind its launch, but it costs about dollars 350 ( pounds 230) in the US.

Norplant is placed under the skin of the upper arm where it cannot be seen, although it can be felt. It consists of six rubber capsules 34mm long and 2.4 mm wide, containing the hormone levonorgestrel, used in brands of the Pill for more than 20 years. (Norplant is unlikely to be suitable for older women who have stopped the Pill for medical reasons.)

A steady amount of hormone is released into the bloodstream each day. Insertion is carried out under local anaesthetic, with the capsules placed in a fan shape through a 2mm incision. The procedure takes less than 15 minutes, and Roussel says it can be done by any trained healthcare professional.

About 55,000 women from 50 countries have taken part in clinical trials since 1975, and it is approved for use 29 countries. Research suggests that in the first two years Norplant is more effective than the Pill and intra-uterine devices, and as effective as sterilisation: the pregnancy rate over five years is 3.9 per 100 users. The most common side effect is irregular bleeding .

Contraception for poor, page 3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in