Seasons stretch to fill the shelves
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is a body of opinion that believes that shops should respect the home-grown season for produce such as asparagus and strawberries by not stocking them out of season. While it is an understandable sentiment, it is not realistic. Year-round availability is here to stay.
And this is where horticulture can play a positive role. If the choice is between a new variety of vegetable developed to be grown at home out of season, and some highly durable variety grown in Latin America or Africa where controls are not as stringent as they are in Britain, at that point I am in favour of extending the home-grown season.
In fact the seasons are changing so fast year on year with the development of new varieties and new farming methods that it is difficult to say with any confidence exactly when they fall for any given fruit or vegetable. It has become accepted that there is an early, a mid and a late season for most crops, and more recently I have heard the term "extra-late".
The point at which extending the seasons becomes distasteful is when there is a reliance on unnatural methods of production, artificial daylight, or chemicals. There is nothing wrong with glasshouse production; we have been practising it for hundreds of years. It is the extremes that are questionable.
Likewise we have been cross-breeding crops to produce certain features for a long time, and there is no reason why a new variety should not be as good as, or even better than, an existing one. It is when the breeding is purely for yield or speed of production and there is no consideration of quality that it becomes negative.
The real danger lies with transgenic varieties, those that have been created by moving DNA from one organism to another. It is difficult to see anything good about tampering with nature in this fashion. But to see all new strains in a negative light simply because they will supersede old varieties or change the status quo is to deny the existence of progress.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments