Seaside exile for homeless `unlawful'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HOMELESS FAMILIES won a High Court test case yesterday overturning an inner-city council's policy of requiring them to live in seaside guesthouses miles from friends, relatives, schools and jobs.
The policy operated by the London Borough of Newham for providing "last resort" emergency accommodation was judged to be "too rigid and too narrow".
The policy wrongly left the council free to provide accommodation anywhere outside its own district "regardless of the difficulties" it would cause for homeless families, said Mr Justice Dyson. In future, council housing officials had properly to consider the individual circumstances of each family.
In the same case the judge ruled that people facing eviction became homeless when possession orders took effect - not, as Newham claimed, on the day of actual eviction.
The eviction date ruling "will oblige all local authorities to provide interim accommodation much earlier", said David Matthias, appearing for the housing authority.
The decision was won by seven homeless families who had been put up in bed-and-breakfast accommodation in resorts such as Great Yarmouth, Brighton and Southend while their applications for more permanent housing were under consideration.
All seven had been brought back and offered temporary accommodation in London after launching their legal action. Newham now faces a legal- costs bill for all seven cases unofficially estimated at not less than pounds 20,000.
A spokesman for Newham said today's ruling had added to "the spiralling crisis of homelessness in the capital".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments