Scott `depressed' by Government secrecy moves
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir Richard Scott last night launched an outspoken attack on the Government over its response to his report on the arms-to-Iraq affair.
Sir Richard said the Government's defence of the use of Public Interest Immunity certificates - the so-called "gagging orders" - in criminal cases such as the Matrix Churchill trial was "unacceptable".
He said he felt a sense of "depression" that ministers were continuing to argue that whole classes of Government documents should be withheld simply because disclosure might affect the "candour" of the advice given by their officials.
And he dismissed the Government's claim that the inner workings of the Whitehall machine should not be exposed to ill-informed public criticism.
"The secrecy with which Government chooses to surround its inner workings, with light cast only by designer leaks and investigative journalists, is not, in my opinion, a reason for perpetuating the sort of PII class claims that were made in the Matrix Churchill cases."
Sir Richard's attack came in the latest of a series of lectures he is giving on his inquiry - his first public comments about PIIs since the publication of his report last month.
In their response to his recommendations on PII, ministers said "the inner workings of the Government machine" should not be exposed to the gaze of those without adequate knowledge of the background and perhaps with some axe to grind.
However, Sir Richard, addressing the Public Law Project in London, insisted that the acceptance of ill-informed criticism was the price that had to be paid for a democratic and open system of Government.
"If Government insists on secrecy for the `inner workings of the Government machine', is it in a position to be surprised if criticism is ill-informed?"
He also rejected the Government's argument that officials would not feel free to give candid advice to ministers if they thought that their advice might become public. "I feel a sense of some depression that this candour argument is still being strongly relied upon," he said.
Sir Richard warned that the continued sanctioning of PII class claims would only serve to increase Whitehall secrecy as ministers and officials sought to withhold more and more classes of documents.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments