Royal Society awards just two research fellowships to women - and 41 to men
President launches investigation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The president of the Royal Society Sir Paul Nurse has launched an investigation after the scientific body awarded just two University Research Fellowships (URF) to women and 41 to men.
The ratio of women receiving the funding - given to scientists at the early stages of their careers - has plummeted from one in three in 2010 to one in 20 this year.
In a blog on the Royal Society's website Sir Paul said: "[Awarding URFs] is normally a highlight of the year. But I, like many fellows, was personally very disappointed to see that only two of them were women.
"It is possible that this year is an anomaly as 2010 appears to have been, but we cannot assume that to be the case. We do not know why the numbers this year are so different to previous years but I have asked for an investigation. We need to find out what happened and if we identify problems in out system we will correct them."
Sir Paul said it was important to note that women made up 21 per cent of the various committees that elected URFs last week.
Women accounted for 19 per cent of applications, but only 13 per cent of those short listed and 9 per cent of those interviewed. Less than five percent were awarded.
Between 17 and 23 per cent of fellowships were given to women from 2011-13.
Sir Paul said the low number of female URFs "sends out a bad message to young female scientists" and that gender imbalance "is a problem across science, including at the Royal Society".
Jonathan Eisen, an American evolutionary biologist at the University of California, called the Royal Society "a club of mostly older white men that every year picks more similar members to join their club".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments