Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Public to be consulted over 'hybrid' embryos

Science Editor,Steve Connor
Thursday 11 January 2007 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The public are to be consulted over plans to create human-animal "hybrid" embryos before a final decision is made this year, the embyrology watchdog has said.

Scientists want to create the embryos for research into stem cells, but need permission from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which issues the necessary licences.

The HFEA had warned the scientists informally that it was unlikely to give permission, given that a White Paper published at the end of last year indicated the Government's disapproval of "hybrid" embryos.

However, the chief executive of the authority, Angela McNab, said yesterday: "After weighing up the scientific, legal and ethical issues, the authority decided there needs to be a full and proper public debate and consultation as to whether in principle licences for these sorts of research could be granted.

"This issue is far from black and white. There is not clear agreement within the scientific community about the need for and benefits of this science."

Scientists broadly welcomed the decision, although some expressed disappointment that it would lead to further delays in starting research that is already under way in China and other parts of the world.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in