Body less able to absorb protein from vegan ‘meat’, study suggests
Findings may lead to development of ingredients to increase uptake of nutrients from plant-based products
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Proteins in plant-based meat alternatives may not be as accessible to human cells as those from real meat, a new study has suggested.
While plants rich in protein, such as soy beans, are commonly used worldwide, researchers, including those from the Ohio State University in the US, say it is unclear how much of the nutrient makes it into human cells.
In the study published on Wednesday in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, scientists assessed if human cells grown in a lab absorb the same quantities of the protein building blocks peptides from meat alternatives as they do from chicken.
The findings may lead to new ingredients that may increase the uptake of nutrients from plant-based meat products, researchers say.
To mimic the look and texture of real meat, they say plant-based substitutes are usually made by dehydrating plants into a powder and mixing them with seasonings.
These mixtures are then typically heated, moistened, and processed through an extruder to produce plant-based meat, researchers say, adding that these products are often thought to be more nutritious since the plants used to make them are high in protein and low in undesirable fats.
However, researchers say the proteins in substitutes may not break down into peptides as well as those from meats.
In the new study, they analysed the quantity of peptides absorbed from a model meat alternative by human cells and compared this to the amount the cells absorbed from a piece of chicken breast (CB).
For the research, scientists created a model meat alternative (MA) made of soy and wheat gluten with the extrusion process.
When cut open, they say the material had long fibrous pieces inside, just like chicken.
Researchers then cooked pieces of the substitute and chicken meat, and broke them down using an enzyme that humans use to digest food.
They found that peptides and their amino acid building blocks from the meat substitutes were less water-soluble than those from chicken, and were also “not absorbed as well by human cells”.
“The amino acid composition showed fewer essential and non-essential amino acids in the MA permeate than in the CB permeate,” scientists wrote in the study.
They say future studies can help identify ingredients that can help boost the peptide uptake of plant-based meat substitutes.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments