Parachute fails on Nasa’s ‘flying saucer’ test
‘Flying saucer’ being tested as a landing vehicle for missions to Mars; next test will be in 2016
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A parachute designed to allow Nasa’s ‘flying saucer’ - otherwise known as its Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD) - glide down to Earth has failed to inflate in its latest test.
The 'flying saucer' is considered crucial for future manned missions to Mars; but Nasa has faced setbacks in this area. During the first test in June 2014 the parachute tore on descent; this second attempt failed; and the earliest LDSD can be tested again is next year.
The purpose of the test was to simulate the high speeds expected on a descent to Mars; but the 30-foot parachute failed to open properly, causing the 3,000 kilogram spacecraft to plummet from 180,000 feet into the Pacific Ocean.
Nasa said the incident has demonstrated the value of these tests; but the groans audible on the video above tell a story of disappointment.
Fingers crossed, it’ll be third time lucky for the ‘flying saucer’.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments